You can select a predefined duration from the drop down box labelled "Expiry", or you can enter a custom value, using the GNU standard format, in the "Other time" field. Usually, you'll be blocking people from the "Block this user" link in the sidebar or the "Block" link next to the username/IP address in the Special:Recentchanges listing. You can also block a range of IP addresses see range blocks (below) for more information. Note that nonexistent usernames can also be blocked, so be certain you have the correct username. Enter the IP address to be blocked, or the name of the registered user account to be blocked, in the "User" field of the form. Specify the IP address or user to be blocked.There are several steps to applying a block: On Gamepedia, all blocks are applied globally, so please block only when necessary.īlocks are applied via the form at the special page Special:Blockip. Like all users, administrators are expected to respect policy and consensus. This status is not intended to represent extra weight within community decisions or generally directing the wiki, nor is it a requirement for moderating or enforcing policy. There are three types of formal administrator status:įor this document all are referred to as administrator. 6.1 Cultural reverence of administrators.If serious problems with spam crop up, bring it up with your wiki's Curse liaison. In most cases, blocking spammers is rarely very useful as they don't often spam more than once from the same IP, so it's usually best to just clean up the spam. IP addresses change over time and an indefinite block might eventually affect a legitimate editor. The above doesn't apply to spammers, but don't place indefinite blocks on anonymous users. Try to use blocks as a last resort and warn first where possible. If that doesn't work, temporarily protecting the page might be a better option than blocking either editor, especially if it's just a matter of getting their attention. For example, if two editors keep reverting each others' edits on a page (edit warring), warn them and try to get them discussing it first. Be light-handed Try to settle problems with the minimum use of administrative powers reasonably possible. Administrators may offer their opinion as well, but they need to take care not to sound as though they're enforcing it. Otherwise, administrators should try to get disagreeing users to discuss the situation. Administrators should only impose their opinions when the community fails to come to a reasonable consensus. Administrate users, not content When it comes to the content of the wiki, the voice of an administrator should be treated as the equal of any other user. If an edit is obviously abusive, feel free to take appropriate action, but where's there is doubt, give the editor the benefit of that doubt. The following guidelines are provided to help administrators exercise good judgment:Īssume good faith When there's doubt about whether an edit was intended to help the wiki, assume it was and treat the editor that way. This doesn't mean that every decision is voted on, but in general, decisions on a wiki should be made by reaching a consensus whenever this is reasonably possible. Public wikis successfully operate on a basically democratic level.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |